Senate poised to pass illegal immigration bill

English: Official portrait of US Senator Marco...

English: Official portrait of US Senator Marco Rubio of Florida. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

On Monday, the Gang of Eight (4 Democrat and 4 Republican Senators) unveiled an outline of a proposed bipartisan deal that finally addresses the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the U.S.  The blueprint provides a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants while stressing the importance of securing the U.S.-Mexico border.  The Senators want the border first secured and the system for tracking people in the U.S. on visas improved. 

The next day President Obama traveled to Nevada, a state with a large Latino population, and held a press conference.  He assured his ardent supporters that a comprehensive illegal immigration bill would be passing in the imminent future.  The president said he was pleased with the newfound bipartisan sentiment in the Senate.  He applauded the progress, but declared he would intervene with his own plan if a deal was not passed in a “timely fashion.”

President Obama’s deal reportedly is more liberal than the current bipartisan proposal.  He wants to more easily provide a path to citizenship to the illegal citizens, in which border security isn’t as great of a priority in his proposal.  Obama’s approach to immigration reform differs from the confrontational style he adopted during the fiscal cliff negotiations and more prominently during the debt ceiling debate.

Other differences include that Obama’s plan does not have a temporary worker program, a provision often favored by businesses seeking to fill low-wage positions.  Senator Rubio (R-FL) said he was “concerned” that President Obama appeared unwilling to accept the beefed up security.  He says: “Without such triggers in place, enforcement systems will never be implemented and we will back in just a few years dealing with millions of new undocumented people in our country.”

The Chicago Tribune reports:

Obama’s proposal would require applicants to pay fines and submit to criminal background checks before being granted a provisional legal status.  Applicants could then apply for a green card, after paying additional fees, learning English and civics, and waiting until a backlog of legal applicants is cleared.  How long that process could take remains another point of contention.  Obama has proposed steps to quickly reduce the legal backlog that conservatives may not accept. 

I am pleased that the Senate is actually doing their job; which is pretty sad if you think about.  We shouldn’t give our politicians a pat on the back for actually working.  If I didn’t work I would be fired.  But I digress.

I don’t think President Obama should have flown to Nevada to hold his press conference.  He won the election.  He doesn’t need to continue campaigning.  I think he should allow the Senators some time to pass legislation.  If a deal is not brokered in a “timely fashion” then he should intervene by actually meeting with the Senators and other party leaders.  At this point he still has not met with any of these leaders.

As for the Senate proposal, I think it is a good start.  I think they are on the right track of solving this problem.  I too think it is important to secure our borders.  I specify borders, because many people assume the entire illegal immigration population is of Mexican descent.  There are illegal Canadian immigrants.  There are illegal immigrants from Europe, Africa and Asia.  Securing all of our borders should be a top priority so that we don’t continue to get an influx of illegal immigrants.

Do you think the press conference was appropriate?

What do you think of the Senate proposal and the Obama proposal?

Is there anything else that needs to be done?

Email: realtalkdebate2012@gmail.com

Twitter: @adrakontaidis & @talkrealdebate

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

About adrakontaidis

A conservative who doesn't pander to the GOP.

6 responses to “Senate poised to pass illegal immigration bill”

  1. reasoningpolitics says :

    Another interesting thing is the fact that somewhere in the ballpark of 40% of illegal immigration came here legally. Their Visas expired and they stayed. Securing borders, although its a valid concern, doesn’t address that at all.

    • realtalkrealdebate says :

      Good point. That’s one of the reasons I said it was a promising start. There are factors that should be addressed.

      • reasoningpolitics says :

        And you’re right. This is promising. It’s also an intellectual victory for George W Bush. John Avlon’s piece in the Daily Beast today showed how close it resembles what he wanted to do.

        Bush’s legacy, although still tainted by Iraq, continues to look better.

      • realtalkrealdebate says :

        Yup, I read your piece today. I know this might not be popular, but I don’t President Bush was as bad as everyone made him out to be.

      • reasoningpolitics says :

        I agree. I voted for him twice, but then came to regret it. I think he’ll be remembered as a better President than anyone gave him credit a the time. Not a great one, but better than he’s widely thought of. Like Truman.

      • realtalkrealdebate says :

        My first election was in 08.

        President Bush has said he thinks and hopes that decades after he left office he would be appreciated more than he was while in office.

        I have never seen the vitriol that was celebrated towards a sitting president before.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: